By B.L. Ochman
As it becomes clear (at last!) that message control is dead, corporations in every industry are scrambling to learn about social media so they can incorporate it into their marketing mix. Fear and misconception abound. Here are the top four issues companies cite, debunked.
1. Employees will waste time with social media.
Many large corporations block their employees from accessing the Internet altogether. Others try to block employees from accessing personal email or social networks like Facebook during work hours.
By Christmas 2011, according to Nielsen, one in every two Americans will have a smart phone
That’s a lot of Internet access available to workers everywhere – and employers can’t stop them from accessing the Internet – on breaks, at lunch, in the bathroom, you name it.
The value of workers of having Internet access – in terms of research, communication, and speed – is far greater than the threat of lost productivity. Companies like Best Buy, Comcast, Dell and many others have increased not only customer satisfaction, but also sales, by having hundreds, and even thousands, of employees monitoring and resolving complaints and issues in social media.
Companies have a right to make policies and rules about personal use of the Internet, but blocking it during work just doesn’t make sense.
2. Haters will damage our brand.
“What about the haters?” is the first question that comes up at corporate meetings. “What if people say bad, mean, nasty things about our brand?”
My more than 14 years of experience helping companies navigate emerging media indicates that the community takes note of who the obvious crazies and haters are, points them out, and then proceeds to negate and ignore them.
And besides, complaints may very well mean that there may be things you need to change about your brand. In that case, you should thank them for letting you know what they are. Then you should make changes.
If you have built an online community that includes people who don’t hate you, that community will rise to your defense and they will handle the problem for you.
Bonus Link: Starbucks Social Media Monitoring & Community Help It Survive Brand Attack
3. We’ll lose control of the brand.
Listen up: every person with a computer and even a tiny skill level has the tools to make their opinion about your brand heard by other people. They’re already talking about you.
You cannot control the message in the Internet Age. You can affect it, but you cannot control it. Your workers are talking about you in closed Facebook groups designed to keep you out so they can talk about you in peace. Your customers are emailing, Tweeting, Facebooking, and that old standby – calling – their friends about their experience with your brand. You don’t have control. You might as well join the conversation. At least that way you can influence what is being said.
4. Employees will give away corporate secrets on social networks and that will help our competitors and affect the stock price.
If you don’t already have a social media policy, you need to create one.
If you don’t trust your employees to talk to customers, or to represent the brand, you need to look at 1) your hiring practices, 2) your training practices.
The truth is that there are more emerging media success stories than there are failures. So c’mon in. The water’s fine and your competitors are already here.
Cartoon by Hugh Macleod, gapingvoid
Dispelling Four Top Corporate Myths About Social Media
BL Ochman | June 24, 2010 | Permanent Link | Comments (6) | TrackBack (
Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/gnp0fnhzxcgi/domains/whatsnextblog.com/html/wp/wp-content/themes/WNO2/single.php on line 32
0)
Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/gnp0fnhzxcgi/domains/whatsnextblog.com/html/wp/wp-content/themes/WNO2/single.php on line 32
0)
Categories: Alternative Marketing, B.L. Ochman, Business Communications, Corporate_Blogging, Internet strategy, Marketing Strategy, Reality Marketing, Social Media, Social Media Marketing
Tags: , BL_Ochman, corporate social media, social media marketing, social media myths
Tags: , BL_Ochman, corporate social media, social media marketing, social media myths
Great post, thanks!
Crossing into the Social Media realm is daunting for established brands, especially when the leadership may have limited personal experience with the internet and, specifically, web 2.0.
An important observation that may be a good addition to the list above revolves around opportunity cost. Choosing to avoid Social Media may feel safe but will likely limit brands to only a small part of the conversation surrounding them and their competitors.
What is the cost of being uninformed?
Thanks again for a terrific post.
Productivity in the workplace can be hindered but also heightened depending on the usage of the application. Companies choose to block or not block social media apps. Unfortunately they are missing out on that grey area where social media apps can be utilized to further innovation and productivity. Palo Alto Networks came out with this whitepaper talking about how to block social media apps and when it is appropriate to let employees utilize these apps productively. To block or not? Check it out: http://bit.ly/d2NZRp
Good Post. I definitely agree with trusting your employees. You should all be focused on the same goal and know the message you want to be sending out.
Instead of having a policy in place that blocks social media completely or doesn’t block social media at all and expects employees to follow policy rules, why not block some pieces of social media and keep some parts of social media accessible? Palo Alto Networks might have found a solution to this problem. Here’s a link to new whitepapers they have created: http://bit.ly/9twcQMTwitter and
http://bit.ly/bsrh9CFacebook
Good post.
You hit the nail right in the head, but when I read it I was thinking something else.
The main reason this is a topic is because of fear that the employees might do something…
I think the social media issue is a result of a much bigger issue, being the lack of a strong, omni-present ‘company soul’, that is actively supported. When employees are the soulmates of your brand (like at Starbucks’), they will never harm it.
It’s like family, there’s this invisible bond. It is called employer branding or better yet Employer Bonding.
I believe with the unstoppable rise of social media, employer branding is entering a new stage of possibilities, but also a new way of thinking for corporations.
With employees as soulmates, social media opens a barrel of creativity beyond imagination.
Looking at the other side of conventions.
Because, no matter what product or service you have, there’s always someone that can make it better faster or cheaper.
The only lasting distinction is made by the group of people who form the organization. They are part of the company-soul.
The impact of this phenomenon is increasing in time when skills such as ‘service’, ‘creativity’, and ‘leadership’ determine the differentiation and the success in the market. It’s the human talent that makes the difference.
Employer branding is to involve and inspire the existing group and also attract new people to realize the promises made to the market.
A great example is the Belgian Facebook group of Audi Brussels A1 factory: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Audi-Brussels-A1/245765018426
Another goldmine is the wonderful company stories. The challenge is surfacing the many fun/interesting/fascinating/… stories and use it for corporate communications, employer branding, “personal branding”, whatever-branding.
The rise of the brand-journalist who finds the stories, organizes them into relevance’s, serving the specific audiences and objectives and makes them better (better written, better imaging (photographs, film, etc.)) and makes them accessible for the soulmates.
Every company or brand can fake a good first impression, but will the get away a second time?
Times are changing: There’s only a second change to make a first impression.
Companies will not lose their control over their brand anymore than they will without going online. Better to go online and counter what people are discussing instead of actually just hoping people will not say anything negative.