‘Snarky’ journalism is all the rage now, writes Jon Friedman at Marketwatch, unsnarkily. “Thanks largely to the advent of the Internet blogs, “snarky” commentaries are sweeping the craft of journalism.” Really? Wow, that’s big news!
Snarkiness, Friedman postulates, “can be loosely defined as demonstrations of criticism, particularly when the target is the establishment, either in the government, the military, corporate America or the dreaded media.”
Friedman attributes snarkiness’ origin to Mark Twain, (he certainly was a snarky type) the Marx Brothers (sarcastic, biting, quick! but snarky?) and Charlie Chaplin (I’d call that a maybe.) Then he calls Johnny Carson snarky. Nuh uh.
He takes the requisite swipe at bloggers v. journalists: “Once, way, way back during the 20th century, journalism was measured by such quaint qualities as dogged reporting and meticulous fact-checking.”
Somehow, his article sounds more bitter than snarky. Snarky involves cleverness.
Wikipedia has a better definition: “Snark refers to a pejorative style of speech or writing. It could loosely be described as irritable or “snidely derisive”; hence, ‘snarkish’, ‘snarky’, ‘to snark at somebody’. (The Urban Dictionary refers to it as a contraction of “snide remark”.) It could less politely be described as ‘bitchy’.”
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who’s the Snarkiest of Them All?
BL Ochman | January 9, 2006 | Permanent Link | Comments (4) | TrackBack (
Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/gnp0fnhzxcgi/domains/whatsnextblog.com/html/wp/wp-content/themes/WNO2/single.php on line 32
0)
Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/gnp0fnhzxcgi/domains/whatsnextblog.com/html/wp/wp-content/themes/WNO2/single.php on line 32
0)
Categories: Blogging and Moblogging
Tags:
Tags:
A few months ago I was thinking about developing a measurement tool called the curmudgeon meter. It was after a particularly frothy post by Jason Calacanis, and I was wondering if I could measure the amount of traffic and response depending upon Jason, and other’s level of curmudgeoness.
“curmudgeoness” — my new favorite word. I love it.
I can – ahem – do “snark” with the best of them. However, I believe that smart, witty curmudgeons can serve a vital role in society, business and culture. They’re the ones that point out the Emperor doesn’t have any clothes (and do it in a way that makes you laugh)…while everyone else is still blinking and nodding to the majority beat. (Mark Twain was a wonderful curmudgeon – on everything from politics to religion. I highly recommend his “Letters from the Earth”)
That said, snarky shouldn’t be confused with bitter, mean, or obscene. Just as saying whatever comes into your little ol’ head shouldn’t be confused with insight and wit. (Ann Coulter, here’s looking at you. Yawn.) And, yes, that was a bit snarky, wasn’t it?
Mary: I couldn’t have said it better myself.
your snarksister