submit to reddit

Mark Glaser interviews CEO Peter Horan to find out why the NY Times paid $410 million for’s 500 blogs.
Says Horan: We have a million pieces of original content on our servers. What would it cost you to write a million articles? What would it cost you to hire the people to write the million articles, to drive traffic? Worldwide we get almost 40 million unique visitors a month. So how much marketing would you spend to get 40 million unique visitors per month?

…we have patents on the Guide system and a lot of the underlying technology. So we’ve spent eight years providing Guides with all the tools so they can publish. We have probably the industry’s most sophisticated ad-serving system.
Neilsen/Netratings says got 21,776,000 unique users in January 2005.
Blogging has the potential to save the Times from losing readers and advertisers. But if the Times follows the same set of editorial checks and balances it uses for print, the blogs will be ineffectual and slow and the money will have been wasted.
Already the Times has cut out the Circuits section and will be replacing it with a Style section. That could very well be because they can’t keep up with blogs like Gizmodo and Endgadget, which move at the speed of light compared to the gray lady’s sluggish pace.